When a President Rejects the Law Entirely
When Donald Trump declared that he does not need international law and instead relies on “his own morality,” he was not merely offering a provocative soundbite. He was articulating a governing philosophy that is fundamentally hostile to the rule of law.
This assertion came in the context of U.S. actions abroad — including the invasion of Venezuela and the extraction of its leader — but its implications are far broader. A president who believes law is optional overseas will eventually treat it as optional at home. History leaves little doubt on that point.
International law exists for one primary reason: to restrain power. Trump’s rejection of it signals not strength, but a willingness to rule without limits. Continue reading “Trump’s “My Morality” Doctrine Is a Direct Threat to the Rule of Law”